Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 27491

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : SC01 - SC05 Full Version

Cord Blood Bilirubin as an Early Marker of Hyperbilirubinemia in Term and Late Preterm Newborns at 48 Hours of Life: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64205.18324
Aparna Gilbert, Baburaj Stephenson

1. Consultant Paediatrician, Department of Paediatrics and Neonatology, Dr. Kamakshi Memorial Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Paediatrics and Neonatology, Dr. SMCSI Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Aparna Gilbert,
2/60, 9th Street, Raghava Nagar, Madipakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: aparnagilbert@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Jaundice is a common clinical condition present during the neonatal period, which can be either physiological or pathological. Early discharge of newborns is a common practice in our country due to medico-social and economic reasons, making post-discharge follow-up of infants challenging compared to developed countries.

Aim: To determine the correlation between cord blood bilirubin levels and the occurrence of hyperbilirubinemia at 48 hours of life in newborns with a gestational age of ≥35 weeks.

Materials and Methods: This cohort study was conducted in the Department of Pediatrics at Dr SMCSI Medical College, Karakonam, Trivandrum, Kerala, India, over a one-year period from June 2017 to June 2018. The exposure variables included the mother’s blood group, baby’s blood group, mode of delivery, gestational age, gender, and weight of the baby. The outcome variables included cord blood and 48-hour serum total and direct bilirubin levels. The data was coded and entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 16.0. Descriptive measures were calculated, and the correlation between cord and 48-hour bilirubin levels was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient formula. Other statistical tests applied were chi-square test and independent t-test.

Results: Total subjects of 500 (243 female and 257 were males) participants were included in the study.Among the 21 babies who underwent phototherapy, 11 were female and 10 were male, and 15 were full term and six were late preterm for their gestational age . Of the 21 babies needing phototherapy, 15 were delivered by normal vaginal delivery, and six were delivered by LSCS. Correlation between cord blood bilirubin and serum bilirubin at 48hr is 0.477 with a p-value <0.001; which indicates mild correlation between the cord blood Total Bilirubin (TB) and serum TB. A cord TB value of 1.45 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 95.2% and specificity of 32.5%. A value of 1.55 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 90.5% and specificity of 40.9%. A cord TB value of 1.65 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 53.9%. These findings suggest that cord bilirubin levels can be used to predict which babies require further evaluation and treatment.

Conclusion: Cord blood serum bilirubin can serve as a useful screening test for predicting neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and ensuring safe post-natal hospital discharge.

Keywords

Gestational age, Jaundice, Newborn, Phototherapy

Jaundice is a common clinical condition present in the neonatal period. It manifests as a visible discoloration of the skin and sclera due to elevated serum concentration of bilirubin. Neonatal jaundice can occur as both physiological and pathological processes in newborns (1). Early discharge of newborn babies is a common practice in our country due to various medico-social and economic reasons (2). However, this practice makes it more difficult to recognise, follow-up, and provide early treatment for neonatal jaundice (3). As a result, there is an increased risk of hospital readmissions, which incurs extra expenses for the family, early weaning due to emotional problems, exposure of a healthy newborn to a hospital environment, and delay in identifying hyperbilirubinemia, thereby increasing the risk of kernicterus (4).

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that newborns discharged within two days should have a follow-up visit after 2-3 days to rule out significant hyperbilirubinemia (5). However, in our country, post-discharge follow-up of infants is challenging compared to developed countries. There are various risk factors for the development of severe hyperbilirubinemia in infants of 35 weeks or more, such as pre-discharge total bilirubin in the high-risk zone, jaundice within the first hour of life, blood group incompatibility, history of phototherapy in a previous sibling, cephalohematoma or significant bruising, inadequate breastfeeding, excessive weight loss, and East Asian race (5).

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia requires timely intervention, whether it is caused by physiological or pathological factors. It affects approximately 60% of term and 80% of preterm neonates during the first week of life (4). Bilirubin enters the brain as unbound bilirubin or bound bilirubin to albumin in the presence of a disrupted blood-brain barrier, which can occur in conditions such as asphyxia, metabolic acidosis, or in premature newborns. It primarily damages brain neurons and subsequently affects astrocytes and microglia (6). The main complications of hyperbilirubinemia include bilirubin-induced neurological dysfunction, bilirubin encephalopathy, and kernicterus (7). Acute bilirubin encephalopathy has three phases: an early phase characterised by hypotonia, lethargy, high-pitched cry, and poor suck; an intermediate phase with hypertonia of extensors, fever, irritability, and seizures; and an advanced phase with a shrill cry, apnoea, seizures, coma, and ultimately death (6),(8). Chronic encephalopathy, known as kernicterus, is characterised by athetosis, sensorineural deafness, dental dysplasia, and intellectual defects (9),(10).

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia at 48 hours is considered significant when the serum bilirubin level is greater than or equal to 15 mg/dL in lower-risk newborns (term newborns without risk factors), greater than or equal to 13 mg/dL in medium-risk newborns (term newborns with risk factors or late preterm newborns without risk factors), and greater than or equal to 11 mg/dL in higher-risk infants (late preterm >35 weeks with risk factors) (1). Risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia include low birth weight, small for gestational age, prematurity, ABO/Rh incompatibility, sepsis, congenital liver disorders, or infections (11). A newborn may not appear icteric until the serum bilirubin level exceeds 5-7 mg/dL (1).

Various methods can be used to predict hyperbilirubinemia, including physical examination, cord blood bilirubin level, serum or cutaneous measurements of bilirubin, or end-expiratory CO measurements (12). The first-line treatment for hyperbilirubinemia is phototherapy (13). If an association can be found between cord bilirubin and 48-hour bilirubin levels among babies delivered in the southern part of India, it can easily predict whether the newborn will develop hyperbilirubinemia and help determine the need for special care, such as referral to a higher center or neonatal nursery care, especially when delivered in peripheral health centers and remote areas. A nomogram for cord blood bilirubin can help categorise babies into different risk categories and predict the likelihood of hyperbilirubinemia. This information can guide decisions regarding early discharge home in the case of low cord blood bilirubin levels or the need for further monitoring or referral to a higher center in the case of higher values of cord blood bilirubin.

This study primarily aims to determine the correlation between cord blood bilirubin and the occurrence of hyperbilirubinemia at 48 hours of life in newborns ≥35 weeks gestation. It also aims to identify the cord blood bilirubin value above which further investigations and phototherapy would be necessary. The secondary objective is to examine the correlation between cord blood bilirubin and subsequent hyperbilirubinemia in relation to various maternal and neonatal factors.

Material and Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Pediatrics at Dr. SMCSI Medical College, Karakonam, Trivandrum, Kerala, India, from June 2017 to June 2018. The study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Dr. SMCSI Medical College, Karakonam, Trivandrum (Ethical approval no- SMCSIMCH/EC(PHARM) 30/205 dated 3rd December 2015).

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated using the expected correlation coefficient (the positive predictive value (p)-34.9%, precision (r)-5%, desired confidence interval (Z1-α/2)-95%, from a similar study by Hamdi N et al., using the formula (14).

n=(Z1-α/2)2 p (1-p)/r2

The sample size was calculated using online sample size calculators for designing clinical research. With a power of 90%, alpha at 0.05, and the expected correlation coefficient r=0.2, the minimum sample size required was 259.

Inclusion criteria: Those healthy newborns ≥35 weeks of gestation and Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration (APGAR) score >7 at 5 minutes were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Those babies with gestational age <35 weeks, birth weight <2.5 kg, those with significant illness requiring NICU admission, major congenital malformations, birth asphyxia, or ecchymosis/cephalohematoma were excluded from the study.

A sample of 500 babies was included.

Study Procedure

All mothers who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were admitted to Dr. SMCSI Medical College were approached. Those who consented were interviewed for information collection at a convenient time for them. Clinical information was collected through one-to-one interviews using a pre-designed and pre-tested questionnaire 2that was formatted and approved by the institution. This process continued until the required sample size was obtained. Maternal and neonatal characteristics, along with anthropometry, were obtained from the neonatal receiving area adjacent to the labor room and obstetric operation theater.

Detection of the cord blood bilirubin: When the umbilical cord was cut after delivery, 2 mL of umbilical venous blood was immediately collected from the placental umbilical cord stump for examination. To avoid hemolysis, the sample was kept at room temperature of 37°C for 30 minutes. Once the blood fully solidified, it was placed in a centrifugal machine with a speed of 2000 turns/min to separate the serum for five minutes. The serum was then tested using the VITROS Calibrator kit 4, and the results were followed-up.

All healthy term and late preterm newborns included in the study were observed for 48 hours of life. Babies who were sick or fell under the exclusion criteria were excluded from the study. At 48 hours, the baby was clinically evaluated again, and blood was taken for serum estimation of total and direct bilirubin levels under strict aseptic precautions. 2 mL of venous blood was collected in a plain bottle containing a clot accelerator. To avoid hemolysis, after the sample was sent to the clinical laboratory, it was promptly placed at room temperature of 37°C for 30 minutes. Once the blood fully solidified, it was placed in a centrifugal machine with a speed of 2000 turns/min to separate the serum for 5 minutes. The serum was then tested using the VITROS Calibrator kit 4.

The pre-designed and pre-tested questionnaire, formatted and approved in our institution after a pilot study, was used. It contained the following sections:

Section A: Details of the mother, including the gestation at which the baby was born, risk factors, type of delivery, and gender of the baby were recorded in this section.

Section B: Laboratory investigation reports, including baby blood group, cord total bilirubin (TB), cord direct bilirubin (DB), 48-hour TB, and 48-hour DB. An infant was considered at lower risk when the gestational age at delivery was >38 weeks and the baby was well. The cutoff for phototherapy at 48 hours was considered as serum bilirubin <15 mg/dL. An infant was considered at medium risk when the gestational age at delivery was >38 weeks+risk factors or 35 weeks-37 weeks+6 days and the baby was well. The cutoff for phototherapy at 48 hours was considered as serum bilirubin <13 mg/dL. An infant was considered at higher risk when the gestational age at delivery was 35 weeks-37 weeks+6 days+risk factors. The cutoff for phototherapy at 48 hours was considered as serum bilirubin <11 mg/dL (1).

All the required fields were entered in the pre-designed and pre-tested proforma. It was filled out through one-to-one questioning by the enumerator. The results of the total bilirubin were plotted on the bilirubin for gestational age and hour-specific chart by the American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia for infants 35 or more weeks of gestation (2). Based on this chart, the need for phototherapy was determined. If the result fell within the range for phototherapy, the baby was placed under the phototherapy sub-unit.

If the baby’s bilirubin levels were within the normal range, the baby was discharged and re-assessed within 48 hours. The exposure variables in this study include the mother’s blood group, baby’s blood group, mode of delivery, gestational age, gender, and weight of the baby. The outcome variables include cord blood and 48-hour serum total and direct bilirubin levels.

Statistical Analysis

The data was coded and entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed using SPSS version 16.0. Descriptive measures were calculated, and correlation was assessed by calculating the correlation coefficient. Other statistical tests, such as chi-square test and independent t-test, were applied. Pearson’s correlation was used to find the correlation between cord blood total bilirubin and total bilirubin after 48 hours, and a p-value <0.005 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The general characteristics considered in this study were the gender of the baby, gestational age, neonatal birth weight, and hyperbilirubinemia needing phototherapy. Maternal risk factors, such as the type of delivery and mother’s exposure to oxytocin during induced vaginal delivery, as well as the mother’s blood group (ABO/RH blood group), were also considered.

Among the 500 normal singleton neonates included in the study, 243 were female and 257 were male. Among the 21 babies who underwent phototherapy, 11 were female and 10 were male (Table/Fig 1).

Of the 500 term and late pre-term delivered neonates, it was shown that 21 babies needed treatment in the form of phototherapy. Out of these, 15 were full term and six were late preterm (Table/Fig 2).

A nomogram prepared using the present study group showed a peak in the earlier part of gestation, from 35 weeks to 37 weeks, compared to the later part of gestation (Table/Fig 3).

In this study, there were a total of 214 babies in the weight band of 2.5 to 2.9 kg, and out of these, 10 (4.7%) babies needed phototherapy. Among the weight band of 3 to 3.4 kg, there were a total of 236 babies, and out of these, 10 (4.2%) babies needed phototherapy. Among the weight band of 3.5 to 4 kg, there were a total of 50 babies, and only one baby (2%) needed phototherapy. The association between weight band and the need for phototherapy was not found to be statistically significant according to the chi-square test, χ2=0.721 (p-value of 0.697) (Table/Fig 4).

Among the total of 500 deliveries considered in this study, 306 were normal vaginal deliveries, and 194 were Lower Segment Caesarean Sections (LSCS). Out of the babies who needed phototherapy, 15 were delivered by normal vaginal delivery, and six were delivered by LSCS (Table/Fig 5).

Out of the total 500 babies, 15 babies were born to B negative mothers, and two of them underwent phototherapy. The percentage of significant hyperbilirubinemia among B negative mothers was 13.3%. This was followed by mothers with O positive blood group, which included 181 in total, and 17 of them needed phototherapy, showing 9.4% of significant hyperbilirubinemia. Among mothers with O negative blood group, which included 23 in total, one of them needed phototherapy, showing 4.2% of significant hyperbilirubinemia. Among mothers with A positive blood group, which included 91 in total, one of them needed phototherapy, showing 1.1% of significant hyperbilirubinemia. However, babies born to mothers with blood groups A negative, B positive, AB positive, and AB negative did not need phototherapy. This difference in proportion was Pstatistically significant using the Chi-square test, χ2=25.696 (p-value of 0.001). This indicates that ABO and Rh incompatibility are major risk factors to be considered, and the probability of mothers with B negative and O positive blood group having a higher chance of significant hyperbilirubinemia (Table/Fig 6).

The correlation between cord blood bilirubin and serum bilirubin at 48 hours is 0.477, with a p-value <0.001, which indicates a mild correlation between cord TB and serum TB (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8).

By comparing the cord blood bilirubin, the distribution was plotted. 235 babies had levels higher than 1.7 mg/dL, out of which only approximately 15 babies underwent phototherapy. A total of 145 babies had values between 1.3 to 1.7 mg/dL, and 4% of them (6 babies) required phototherapy. There were a total of 120 babies whose cord blood bilirubin levels were less than 1.3 mg/dL, and none of them needed treatment for early neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Hence, babies with cord blood bilirubin levels above 1.3 mg/dL can be considered at risk for early neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

The mean cord bilirubin level in the present study is 1.66±0.504 mg/dL. The number of newborns with significant hyperbilirubinemia increased with increasing cord bilirubin levels. The ROC curve was created to determine the cutoff value of cord total bilirubin above which phototherapy was needed (Table/Fig 9). The cord total bilirubin value of 1.45 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 32.5%. The value of 1.55 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 40.9%. The cord total bilirubin value of 1.65 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 53.9%. The correlation between cord DB and 48-hour DB is 0.070, with a p-value of 0.117, indicating no significance between cord DB and serum DB (Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11).

Discussion

Jaundice is a common clinical condition in the neonatal period that requires timely intervention. In the current era of early discharge (15), cord blood parameters are a more practical and useful method of assessing the risk for hyperbilirubinemia, particularly in the early neonatal period (8).

The present prospective cohort study was conducted among 500 term and late preterm babies born in a tertiary care hospital. The objective was to identify whether umbilical cord serum bilirubin values soon after birth could predict the risk of significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in the early neonatal period. The mechanisms of jaundice development in the early post-natal period have already occurred in late foetal life. Most foetal bilirubin is unconjugated due to a decreased ability of the foetal liver to conjugate bilirubin.

In the present study, ROC curve analysis showed that a cord total bilirubin value of 1.45 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 32.5%. The value of 1.55 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 40.9%. The cord total bilirubin value of 1.65 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 53.9%. An area under the curve of 74.5% was observed for cord bilirubin levels above 2 mg/dL. The most useful cut-off point for serum bilirubin levels in cord blood was found to be more than 1.6 mg/dL, except for one baby who had no risk factors but developed jaundice at 48 hours. The low-risk group of babies were those with a cord bilirubin level of <1.4 mg/dL, and they did not develop significant jaundice at 48 hours of life. This proposal may help ensure safer early discharge for these newborns.

Taksande A et al., found that cord serum bilirubin values >2 mg/dL have a sensitivity of 89.5%, specificity of 85%, negative predictive value of 98.7%, and positive predictive value of 38.8%, which is similar to the findings of the present study (16). In a similar study by Kumaran U et al., it was suggested that healthy term babies with cord bilirubin <2 mg/dL can be discharged early with assurance to parents (17). Hamdi N et al., also observed that the optimum cutoff level for predicting neonatal jaundice using umbilical cord blood bilirubin was 2.0 mg/dL, and hyperbilirubinemia requiring intervention can be predicted with 96.25% clinical sensitivity when the level is above 2 mg/dL (14).

In the present study, the female-to-male ratio of newborns who developed significant hyperbilirubinemia was 1.05:1. When considering babies who underwent phototherapy, the female-to-male ratio was 0.9:1. The prevalence of hyperbilirubinemia was higher in females compared to males, but this difference was not found to be statistically significant, which is consistent with studies by Bernaldo AJ and Segre CA, and Newman TB et al., (18),(19). Babies who underwent a trial of labor or were delivered by normal vaginal delivery had a higher chance of requiring phototherapy, which indirectly suggests a relationship between oxytocin and hyperbilirubinemia (20).

Cord blood bilirubin can be used as a non-invasive test to predict which babies will develop neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Combining cord blood bilirubin with risk factors provides better accuracy than relying solely on biochemical values.

Limitation(s)

Parameters like umbilical cord albumin and bilirubin albumin ratio were not measured and preterm infants were not included in the study.

Conclusion

This study found a statistically significant correlation between cord blood bilirubin and serum bilirubin at 48 hours. The mean cord blood bilirubin level in this study was 1.6 mg/dL, and babies with cord blood bilirubin levels above 1.6 mg/dL had a higher chance of requiring phototherapy. When considering various maternal and neonatal factors, male babies had a higher chance of developing early neonatal hyperbilirubinemia that required treatment. Neonates who underwent a trial of labor or were delivered by normal vaginal delivery had a higher chance of requiring phototherapy, suggesting a possible relationship between oxytocin and hyperbilirubinemia. When comparing maternal and baby’s blood groups, babies with ABO incompatibility or Rh incompatibility had a higher chance of requiring phototherapy.

References

1.
Cloherty JP, Eichenwald EC, Hansen AR, Ann R Stark. Manual of Neonatal Care. 7th ed South Asian Edition. Wolters Kluwer (India) Pvt Ltd; 2016. Pp.314.
2.
American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):297-316. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Zhang L, Hu P, Wang J, Zhang M, Zhang QL, Hu B. Prenatal training improves new mothers’ understanding of jaundice. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:1668-73. Doi: 10.12659/MSM.893520. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Shaughnessy EE, Goyal NK. Jaundice and hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn. Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, St Geme III JW, Schor NF, Ambalavanan N, Carlo WA. Nelson Textbook Of Pediatrics. 20th ed. USA. Elsevier. 2020. Pp. 870-80.
5.
Lain SJ, Roberts CL, Bowen JR, Nassar N. Early discharge of infants and risk of readmission for jaundice. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):314-21. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Watchko JF, Tiribelli C. Bilirubin-induced neurologic damage--mechanisms and management approaches. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(21):2021-30. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Usman F, Diala UM, Shapiro SM, Le Pichon JB, Slusher TM. Acute bilirubin encephalopathy and its progression to kernicterus: Current perspectives. Research and Reports in Neonatology. 2018;8:33-44. Doi: https://doi. org/10.2147/RRN.S125758. [crossref]
8.
Ullah S, Rahman K, Hedayati M. Hyperbilirubinemia in neonates: Types, causes, clinical examinations, preventive measures and treatments: A narrative review article. Iran J Public Health. 2016;45(5):558-68.
9.
Johnson L, Bhutani VK. The clinical syndrome of bilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction. Semin Perinatol. 2011;35(3):101-13. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Wusthoff CJ, Loe IM. Impact of bilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction on neurodevelopmental outcomes. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;20(1):52-57. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Bajpai PC, Misra PK, Agarwal M, Engineer AD. An etiological study of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. Indian J Pediatr. 1971;38(286):424-29. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Okuyama H, Yonetani M, Uetani Y, Nakamura H. End-tidal carbon monoxide is predictive for neonatal non-hemolytic hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Int. 2001;43(4):329-33. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Use of phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society. CMAJ. 1986;134(11):1237-45.
14.
Hamdi N, Elgayar A, Salah MH. Cord blood bilirubin as a predictor of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Med J Cairo Univ. 2012;80(2):31-36.
15.
Lain SJ, Roberts CL, Bowen JR, Nassar N. Early discharge of infants and risk of readmission for jaundice. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):314-21. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Taksande A, Vilhekar K, Jain M, Zade P, Atkari S, Verkey S. Prediction of the development of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia by increased umbilical cord blood bilirubin. Curr Pediatr Res. 2005;9(1-2):59.
17.
Kumaran U, Arya AK, Rakholia R, Kumaran U, Arya AK, Rakholia R. Study to predict newborn at risk of developing neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia by measuring cord blood bilirubin. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2016;31(5):395-97. [crossref]
18.
Bernaldo AJ, Segre CA. Bilirubin dosage in cord blood: Could it predict neonatal hyperbilirubinemia? Sao Paulo Med J. 2004;122(3):99-103. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Newman TB, Newman TB, McCulloch CE. Efficacy of phototherapy for newborns with hyperbilirubinemia: A cautionary example of an instrumental variable analysis. Med Decis Mak. 2012;321(1):83-92. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Buchan PC. Pathogenesis of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia after induction of labour with oxytocin. Br Med J. 1979;2(6200):1255-57.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64205.18324

Date of Submission: Mar 29, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Apr 26, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Aug 04, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 01, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jul 03, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 02, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com